Manning

United States v. Manning

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 200806-35613California6,410 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKeown, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAY MANNING, in his official capacity as Director of the Washington Department of Ecology; WASHINGTON

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; STATE OF

WASHINGTON,

Defendants-Appellants, No. 06-35613 and  D.C. No.

YES ON I-297: PROTECT CV-04-05128-AAM

WASHINGTON; BOB APPLE;

WASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST

RESEARCH GROUP; ADAM KLINE;

TOBY NIXON; HEART OF AMERICA

NORTHWEST,

Defendant-Intervenors, v.

FLUOR HANFORD INC.; TRI-CITY

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL,

Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees. 

5881 5882 UNITED STATES v. MANNING

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAY MANNING, in his official capacity as Director of the Washington Department of Ecology; WASHINGTON

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY; STATE OF

WASHINGTON,

Defendants, and No. 06-35664 YES ON I-297: PROTECT  D.C. No.

WASHINGTON; BOB APPLE; CV-04-05128-AAM

WASHINGTON PUBLIC INTEREST

RESEARCH GROUP; ADAM KLINE;

TOBY NIXON; HEART OF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.