Alamedia

Williams v. Alamedia

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 200805-55604California139 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEITH LEE WILLIAMS,  No. 05-55604 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-03-00196-NM EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr., Warden,  Central District of Respondent-Appellee. California, Los Angeles

 ORDER

Filed May 30, 2008

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Carlos T. Bea, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon receiving certification that Keith Lee Williams did not submit himself to California state authorities within the 60-day conditional period set forth in Williams v. Alameida, 511 F.3d 973, 974 (9th Cir. 2007), we now dismiss Wil- liams’s appeal pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6089

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.