Barnes-Wallace

Barnes-Wallace v. Boy Scouts of America

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 200804-55732California224 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE; 

MAXWELL BREEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. No. 04-55732

CITY OF SAN DIEGO,

Defendant,  D.C. No.

CV-00-01726-

and NAJ/AJB

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - DESERT

PACIFIC COUNCIL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE; 

MAXWELL BREEN; LORI BARNES-

WALLACE, Guardian Ad Litem; LYNN BARNES-WALLACE, Guardian Ad Litem; MICHAEL BREEN, No. 04-56167 Guardian Ad Litem; VALERIE D.C. No. BREEN, Guardian Ad Litem, Plaintiffs-Appellants,  CV-00-01726-

NAJ/AJB

v. ORDER

CITY OF SAN DIEGO; BOY SCOUTS OF

AMERICA - DESERT PACIFIC

COUNCIL,

Defendants-Appellees.  Filed June 11, 2008

Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

6625 6626 BARNES-WALLACE v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

ORDER

The petition of Defendants-Appellees for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The certification order filed in this case on December 18, 2006, is withdrawn. A new certification order with accompanying concurrence and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.