Yee

Barona Band of Mission Indians v. Yee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 200806-55918California4,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

After nearly two centuries of displacement of the Barona Band of Mission Indians by European and then American encroachment, the United States enacted legislation to provide a tract of land in rural San Diego County to serve as a reserva- tion for the Tribe. Until the early 1990s, however, the Tribe suffered from deep structural economic difficulties. Following the nationwide trend of Native Americans seeking to infuse economic life into depressed reservations, the Tribe opened up a casino in 1996: the Barona Valley Ranch Resort & Casino — “Where The Real Players Play, and Win.”

By 2001, enough of these real players had played and lost for the Tribe to plan a $75 million expansion to the casino floor and hotel, replete with a new wedding chapel, parking 1 Although the Board has not pursued on appeal its contention that we lack jurisdiction under the Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341, we must consider the issue sua sponte. Having done so, we agree with the district court that our courts have jurisdiction to entertain this action. Both the dis- trict court and we have jurisdiction because this is an appeal from an action by the Tribe under 28 U.S.C. § 1362 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.