Clemens

Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Good Law
530 F.3d 852·2008 WL 2446317·2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12929
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 200806-56410California3,315 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

Keith Clemens brought this class action against Daimler Corporation alleging that DaimlerChrysler breached express and implied warranties and committed fraud in the sale of Dodge Neon cars containing defective head gaskets from 1995 to 1998. The district court granted DaimlerChrysler’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the warranty claims. It also granted DaimlerChrysler’s motion for summary judgment on the fraud claims, holding that one claim was barred by the statute of limitations and the other failed on the merits. Clemens appealed all of these rulings, and we affirm.

FACTS

Clemens bought a new 1998 Dodge Neon from an independent Dodge dealership. After driving the car for approximately 50,000 miles, Clemens noticed that the engine had begun to leak oil. The oil leak worsened, and when the odometer reached 60,000 miles, Clemens performed some research on the internet and learned that head gasket failure (and resulting oil leaks) were a common problem on this model automobile.

In September 2002, a Chrysler-authorized service center referred Clemens to a customer service hotline, which denied his request for a repair discount. Rather than pay for the repair, Clemens replaced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.