Flores Juarez v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 200804-75717California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS FLORES JUAREZ, 

Petitioner, No. 04-75717 v.  Agency No.

A95-451-282

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 5, 2008* Pasadena, California

Filed June 26, 2008

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Ruggero J. Aldisert** and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable Ruggero J. Aldisert, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation. COUNSEL

Sung U. Park, Law Offices of Sung U. Park, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; John C. Cun- ningham, Shelley R. Goad, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Flores Juarez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.