Vasquez-Ramos

United States v. Vasquez-Ramos

Bad Law
531 F.3d 987·2008 WL 2552254
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 200806-50553, 06-50694California2,579 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER AND OPINION

ORDER

The opinion published April 10, 2008, and appearing at 522 F.3d 914 , is hereby withdrawn. Due to a printer’s error, the published opinion does not reflect the opinion as filed by panel. The opinion filed concurrently with this order reflects the opinion actually filed by the panel with the clerk and should be published by the printer as the panel’s opinion forthwith.

DefendanL-Appellant Mario Vasquez-Ramos’s Motion for Joinder in Co-Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is GRANTED.

The panel has voted to deny the Defendants-Appellants’ joint petition for panel rehearing. Judges Schroeder and Tallman vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Goodwin so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc as to both cases is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be entertained.

OPINION

Mario Manuel Vasquez-Ramos and Luis Manuel Rodriguez-Martinez (Defendants) were charged by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.