Mayer

United States v. Mayer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 200807-30274California6,055 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

I. Factual Background

In February 2004, Mayer was on both post-prison supervi- sion and probation as a result of two convictions for drug- related offenses.1 Mayer’s probation record indicated that he had lived at 103 Hansen Lane since September 2000. On 1 Mayer was serving post-prison supervision for a conviction, entered on October 8, 2001, in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Lane County of: (i) unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, (ii) deliv- ery of marijuana for consideration, (iii) unlawful possession of a con- trolled substance, and (iv) felon in possession of a firearm. Mayer was sentenced to probation for a conviction, entered on February 2, 2004, in the same court for: (i) unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, and (ii) unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. 7734 UNITED STATES v. MAYER August 26, 2003, Mayer informed his Parole and Probation Officer, Melinda Rauch, that he had moved temporarily to a new residence located at 605 Davis Street. Between August 2003 and February 2004, Rauch met with Mayer twice at 605 Davis Street.

On February 24, 2004, one of Mayer’s former neighbors from Hansen Lane…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.