Mayer
United States v. Mayer
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
I. Factual Background
In February 2004, Mayer was on both post-prison supervi- sion and probation as a result of two convictions for drug- related offenses.1 Mayer’s probation record indicated that he had lived at 103 Hansen Lane since September 2000. On 1 Mayer was serving post-prison supervision for a conviction, entered on October 8, 2001, in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for Lane County of: (i) unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, (ii) deliv- ery of marijuana for consideration, (iii) unlawful possession of a con- trolled substance, and (iv) felon in possession of a firearm. Mayer was sentenced to probation for a conviction, entered on February 2, 2004, in the same court for: (i) unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance, and (ii) unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. 7734 UNITED STATES v. MAYER August 26, 2003, Mayer informed his Parole and Probation Officer, Melinda Rauch, that he had moved temporarily to a new residence located at 605 Davis Street. Between August 2003 and February 2004, Rauch met with Mayer twice at 605 Davis Street.