Rodriquez

United States v. Rodriquez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 200804-30397California180 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Nos. 04-30397 Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross- 04-30494 Appellant, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00142-

GINO GONZAGA RODRIQUEZ,  RHW

Eastern Defendant-Appellant/Cross- Appellee. District of Washington, Spokane

 ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 7, 2008

Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges, and Consuelo Marshall,* District Judge.

ORDER

This case is hereby resubmitted.

Pursuant to the judgment of the United States Supreme Court issued on May 19, 2008 in United States v. Rodriquez, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1783, we vacate our opinion at 464 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2006), vacate the district court’s decision, and remand to the district court for further proceedings con- sistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

*The Honorable Consuelo Marshall, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

8117

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.