Hall Street Assoc. v. Mattel Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 200805-35721California221 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HALL STREET ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a  Washington Limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MATTEL INC., a Delaware No. 05-35721 corporation, D.C. No. Defendant-Appellant, and  CV-00-00355-REJ District of Oregon, TYCO INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware Portland corporation; TYCO MANUFACTURING ORDER CORP., an Oregon corporation; TYCO TOYS, INC., a Delaware corporation; VIEW-MASTER IDEAL GROUP, INC., an Oregon corporation, Defendants.  On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 8, 2008

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Stephen Reinhardt, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This case is hereby resubmitted.

This court, having concluded that Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. has preserved the issue of sources of authority, other

8145 8146 HALL STREET ASSOCIATES v. MATTEL than the Federal Arbitration Act, through which a court may enforce an arbitration award, the cause is remanded to the dis- trict court to make such determinations and conduct such hearings as may be consistent with the Supreme Court’s deci- sion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.