Dela Cruz v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 200805-76564California1,713 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIEGO ANTIGUA DELA CRUZ, JR.;  Nos. 05-76564

NIEVA ESPIRITU DELA CRUZ,

06-75285 Petitioners, v.  Agency Nos.

A77-835-221

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY,* Attorney A77-835-223 General,

OPINION

Respondent.  On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2008** San Francisco, California

Filed July 9, 2008

Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges, and Robert J. Timlin,*** District Judge.

Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge Graber

*Michael B. Mukasey is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). **The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ***The Honorable Robert J. Timlin, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. COUNSEL

Ted Laguatan, Law Offices of Ted Laguatan and Associates, Daly City, California, for the petitioners.

Don G. Scroggin and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.