Bustamante

Bustamante v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 200806-17228California1,768 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTS

Alma Bustamante is a citizen of the United States and resides in Yuma, Arizona. Her husband, Jose Bustamante, is a citizen of Mexico and resides in San Luis Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico. Jose has a business in Mexico and for many years commuted between Mexico and the United States using a border-crossing card issued by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service.

Seeking to obtain lawful permanent resident status for her husband, Alma filed an immediate relative petition on Jose’s behalf. Jose applied for an immigrant visa at the United States Consulate in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. The Bustamantes were informed by Eric Cruz, a consular official, that the Consulate had reason to believe that Jose was trafficking in illegal drugs. By virtue of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(C), “[a]ny alien who the consular officer or the Attorney General knows or has reason to believe is or has been an illicit trafficker in any controlled 8306 BUSTAMANTE v. MUKASEY substance . . . is inadmissible.” Cruz refused to reveal the information upon which this determination was based, assert- ing that the information was secret.

At a subsequent meeting in Mexico with officials of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.