Berger

Berger v. City of Seattle

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 200805-35752California153 words

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL JAMES BERGER, a single  man also known as Magic Mike, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SEATTLE; VIRGINIA No. 05-35752 ANDERSON, Director of Seattle Center; MICHAEL ANDERSON,  D.C. No.

CV-03-03238-JLR

Emergency Service Manager for Seattle Center; TEN UNKNOWN ORDER EMPLOYEES/OFFICERS, of the Seattle Center and the City of Seattle, all in both their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellants.  Filed July 14, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

8901

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.