Howell

Howell v. Polk

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 200806-16418California1,395 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT ALLEN HOWELL, husband;  PATTI HOWELL, wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHEILA SULLIVAN POLK, Yavapai County Attorney; ROBERT REED, City of Prescott Police Chief; DAVID BENNER, City of Prescott Assistant Police Chief; PAT HUNTSMAN, Town of Chino Valley No. 06-16418 Police Chief; GEORGE “BUCK” BUCHANAN, Yavapai County  D.C. No.

CV-04-02280-FJM

Sheriff; DAN SCHATZ, City of Prescott Valley Police Chief; PAT OPINION SPENCE, City of Cottonwood Police Chief; LLOYD JONES, City of Clarkdale Police Chief; JOE VERNIER, City of Sedona Police Chief; JOHN C. WISCHMEYER; ALLEN MUMA, Jerome Police Chief; JOHN O’HAGAN, Yavapai County Sheriff’s Office; DANA SCHMIDT, Sedona Assistant Police Chief; 

8797 8798 HOWELL v. POLK

PETE HODAP, City of Prescott  police officer and former supervisor of the Prescott Area Narcotics Task Force (“PANT”); KEL PALGUTA, City of Prescott Valley police officer and officer of PANT; RANDY JOHNSON, Yavapai County Sheriff officer and officer of PANT; CHRIS WYLIE, City of Clarkdale police officer and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.