Mario Mendoza-Attilla v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
447 F. App'x 764
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 201110-72250California439 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Mario Mendoza-Attila, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir.2004). We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Mendoza-Attila does not challenge the agency’s dispositive determination that his asylum claim was time-barred.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Mendoza- Attila did not experience past persecution when he was robbed by gangs. See Gormley v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2004) (“Random, isolated criminal acts perpetrated by anonymous thieves do not establish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.