Stringer

United States v. Stringer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 200806-30100California5,950 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Introduction

The United States appeals from a final order of the district court dismissing criminal indictments against three individual defendants charging counts of criminal securities violations. The dismissal was premised on the district court’s conclusion that the government had engaged in deceitful conduct, in vio- lation of defendants’ due process rights, by simultaneously 9712 UNITED STATES v. STRINGER pursuing civil and criminal investigations of defendants’ alleged falsification of the financial records of their high-tech camera sales company. Foreseeing the possibility of an appeal, the district court held that the indictments must be dis- missed, but ruled in the alternative that, should there be a criminal trial, all evidence provided by the individual defen- dants in response to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) subpoenas should be suppressed. See United States v. Stringer, 408 F. Supp. 2d 1083 (D. Or. 2006).

The court also suppressed evidence relating to the “Swed- ish Drop Shipment,” an allegedly fraudulent accounting entry. The district court reasoned that the government had improp- erly interfered with, or intruded into, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.