Romero-Ruiz

Romero-Ruiz v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 200806-74494California2,782 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTIAN ALFREDO ROMERO-RUIZ, 

Petitioner, No. 06-74494 v.  Agency No.

A77-436-614

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 17, 2008—San Francisco, California

Filed August 13, 2008

Before: Stephen S. Trott and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges, and Michael R. Hogan,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Thomas

*The Honorable Michael R. Hogan, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

10535 10538 ROMERO-RUIZ v. MUKASEY

COUNSEL

Vikram K. Badrinath, Vikram Badrinath, P.C., Tucson, Ari- zona, for the petitioner.

Lauren E. Fascett, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. ROMERO-RUIZ v. MUKASEY 10539

OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

This petition for review presents the question of whether an immigrant who did not have lawful permanent resident status at the time of his mother’s naturalization is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.