Nhtsa

Center for Biological v. Nhtsa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 200806-71891California30,846 words

Opinion

Opinion

Volume 1 of

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, 

Petitioner, v.  No. 06-71891

NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC

SAFETY ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA EX REL. BILL LOCKYER,

ATTORNEY GENERAL; STATE OF

CONNECTICUT; STATE OF MAINE;

COMMONWEALTH OF

MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF NEW

JERSEY; STATE OF NEW MEXICO;

STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF

OREGON; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; No. 06-72317 STATE OF VERMONT; DISTRICT OF  TRAN No. COLUMBIA; CITY OF NEW YORK, Reg. 17,566 Petitioners, v.

NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC

SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, an agency within the UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Respondents. 

10773 10774 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. NHTSA

STATE OF MINNESOTA, 

Petitioner, v. No. 06-72641 NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC  TRAN No. SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, an agency Energy Policy Act within the UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Respondent. 

SIERRA CLUB; PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC., 

Petitioners, v. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.