Hepting
Hepting v. At&t Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467
MMC,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 06-17132 and D.C. No.
CV-06-00672-VRW
WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC.,
Intervenors, v.
AT&T CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellant, and
AT&T, INC.,
Defendant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Intervenor.
11353 11354 HEPTING v. AT&T CORPORATION
TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS, ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of No. 06-17137 Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff D.C. No.
CV-06-00672-VRW
in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Northern District of Plaintiffs-Appellees, California, San Francisco v.