Cpath
Cpath v. Office of US Trade
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 200806-16682California3,209 words
Opinion
Opinion
N. Randy Smith CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS v. OFFICE U.S. TRADE 11459, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS ON
TRADE AND HEALTH (CPATH);
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC HEALTH
ASSOCIATION - NORTH; CHINESE
PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION;
PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY, No. 06-16682 Plaintiffs-Appellants, and D.C. No.
CV-05-05177-MJJ
AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION, OPINION
Plaintiff, v.
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE; UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 16, 2008—San Francisco, California
Filed August 22, 2008
Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Richard Mills,* District Judge.
*The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
11455 11456 CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS v. OFFICE U.S. TRADE Opinion by Judge N. Randy Smith CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS v. OFFICE U.S. TRADE 11459