Cpath

Cpath v. Office of US Trade

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 200806-16682California3,209 words

Opinion

Opinion

N. Randy Smith CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS v. OFFICE U.S. TRADE 11459, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS ON 

TRADE AND HEALTH (CPATH);

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC HEALTH

ASSOCIATION - NORTH; CHINESE

PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION;

PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL

RESPONSIBILITY, No. 06-16682 Plaintiffs-Appellants, and  D.C. No.

CV-05-05177-MJJ

AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION, OPINION

Plaintiff, v.

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE; UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Martin J. Jenkins, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 16, 2008—San Francisco, California

Filed August 22, 2008

Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Richard Mills,* District Judge.

*The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

11455 11456 CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS v. OFFICE U.S. TRADE Opinion by Judge N. Randy Smith CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS v. OFFICE U.S. TRADE 11459

COUNSEL

Martin Wagner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.