Amaker

Amaker v. King County

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 200807-35241California4,028 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBINETTE AMAKER,  No. 07-35241 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-05-01470-MJP KING COUNTY, a municipal Western District of corporation; STANLEY MEDICAL Washington, RESEARCH INSTITUTE, a foreign  Seattle corporation; E. FULLER TORREY, ORDER Defendants-Appellees. CERTIFYING

QUESTIONS TO

THE

WASHINGTON

 SUPREME COURT

Filed August 26, 2008

Before: Richard R. Clifton and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Brian E. Sandoval,* District Judge.

COUNSEL

Stephen L. Bulzomi (argued), Jeremy A. Johnston, Messina Bulzomi Christensen, Tacoma, Washington, for the appellant.

Grant S. Degginger (argued), June K. Campbell, Ryan P. McBride, Lane Powell PC, Seattle, Washington, for the appel- lees.

*The Honorable Brian E. Sandoval, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

11709 11710 AMAKER v. KING COUNTY

ORDER

In this case arising out of diversity jurisdiction, we are asked to decide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.