Johanson

Johanson v. Cir

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 3, 200806-75623California1,985 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTS

In 1996, Carol A. Johanson and John Weiler divorced in California after nearly thirty years of marriage. Johanson and Weiler executed a “Marital Settlement Agreement” that obli- gated Weiler to make monthly “spousal support” payments of $5,250 to Johanson until October 31, 2010. With respect to these payments, the Agreement explicitly provides:

IV. SPOUSAL SUPPORT

* * * JOHANSON v. CIR 12091 26. Both parties are aware that this marriage is one considered and characterized as a marriage of long duration. As a result, certain responsibilities for sup- port may exist between the parties for some unknown length of time after separation and after a dissolution is entered unless both parties freely and voluntarily waive their rights to support and agree to the termination of the courts [sic] jurisdiction over the issue of spousal support. Once this waiver and agreement is entered, it is non-reversible and may work a considerable hardship on either one or both of the parties.

26. [sic] Being aware of the above, the court will retain jurisdiction over John’s right to collect spousal support from Carol until May 31, 2011 at which time his right…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.