Sprint Telephony Pcs v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 200805-56076California4,770 words

Opinion

Opinion

GRABER, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P., a  Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, and PACIFIC BELL WIRELESS LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, dba Cingular Wireless, Plaintiff, v. Nos. 05-56076 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a division 05-56435  of the State of California; GREG COX, in his capacity as a D.C. No. supervisor of the County of San CV-03-1398-BTM Diego; DIANNE JACOB, in her OPINION capacity as a supervisor of the County of San Diego; PAM SLATER, in her capacity as a supervisor of the County of San Diego; RON ROBERTS, in his capacity as a supervisor of the County of San Diego; BILL HORN, in his capacity as a supervisor of the County of San Diego, Defendants-Appellees/ Cross-Appellants.  Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

12699 12700 SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Argued and Submitted June 24, 2008—Pasadena, California

Filed September 11, 2008

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.