White

White v. Mayflower Transit

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 200807-55528California1,612 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZEDDRICK F. WHITE,  No. 07-55528 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-06-06710-CAS

MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, L.L.C.,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 26, 2008*

Filed September 12, 2008

Before: Jerome Farris, Robert R. Beezer, and Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Beezer

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

12727 12730 WHITE v. MAYFLOWER TRANSIT

COUNSEL

Zeddrick F. White, pro se appellant.

Gregg S. Garfinkel and Brent M. Finch, Stone, Rosenblatt & Cha, Woodland Hills, California, for the appellee.

OPINION

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

Zeddrick White (“White”) appeals pro se the district court’s order granting Mayflower Transit, L.L.C.’s (“Mayflower”) motion to dismiss his second amended com- plaint. We affirm.

I

This case arises out of an agreement between White and Mayflower, in which Mayflower…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.