White
White v. Mayflower Transit
Opinion
Opinion
Beezer, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ZEDDRICK F. WHITE, No. 07-55528 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-06-06710-CAS
MAYFLOWER TRANSIT, L.L.C.,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 26, 2008*
Filed September 12, 2008
Before: Jerome Farris, Robert R. Beezer, and Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Beezer
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
12727 12730 WHITE v. MAYFLOWER TRANSIT
COUNSEL
Zeddrick F. White, pro se appellant.
Gregg S. Garfinkel and Brent M. Finch, Stone, Rosenblatt & Cha, Woodland Hills, California, for the appellee.
OPINION
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Zeddrick White (“White”) appeals pro se the district court’s order granting Mayflower Transit, L.L.C.’s (“Mayflower”) motion to dismiss his second amended com- plaint. We affirm.
I
This case arises out of an agreement between White and Mayflower, in which Mayflower…