Drake
United States v. Drake
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 06-10073 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-05-00050-DWM
JOSEPH F. DRAKE,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the District Court Guam Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 1, 2007—Honolulu, Hawaii
Filed September 15, 2008
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, A. Wallace Tashima, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain
12825 12828 UNITED STATES v. DRAKE
COUNSEL
Gretchen Fusilier, Carlsbad, California, argued the cause for the defendant-appellant and filed the briefs.
Rosetta L. San Nicolas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Guam, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellee and filed the brief; Leonardo M. Rapadas, Guam and NMI, was on the brief. UNITED STATES v. DRAKE 12829
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether a two-year delay between indict- ment in the local Guam courts and eventual conviction on dif- ferent charges in federal district court violated a defendant’s right to a speedy trial.