Stratman

Stratman v. Leisnoi Inc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 200807-35934California5,599 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Statutory Framework

I. ANCSA

Congress enacted ANCSA in 1971 in order to “resolve land disputes between the federal government, the state of Alaska, Alaskan Natives, and non-native settlers.” Leisnoi, Inc. v. Stratman, 154 F.3d 1062, 1064 (9th Cir. 1998). In its findings and declaration of policy, Congress recognized “an immediate need for a fair and just settlement” of aboriginal land claims that was to be “accomplished rapidly, with certainty, in con- formity with the real economic and social needs of Natives, [and] without litigation . . . .” 43 U.S.C. § 1601(a), (b). In fur- therance of this basic purpose, “Alaskan Natives received, in exchange for the extinction of all claims of aboriginal title, 14128 STRATMAN v. LEISNOI, INC. approximately forty-four million acres of land and nearly $1 billion in federal funds.” Leisnoi, 154 F.3d at 1064. These resources were distributed amongst thirteen “Regional Corpo- rations,” groups of Natives unified by a “common heritage and sharing common interests[,]” 43 U.S.C. § 1606(a), and an unspecified number of “Village Corporations,” corporate enti- ties based around native villages. 43 U.S.C. § 1607. The native…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.