Centerprise International v. Micron Technology, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 200806-15636California5,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

FISHER, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS 

MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST

LITIGATION.

CENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL, LTD,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.; MICRON

SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS INC.; No. 06-15636 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; D.C. Nos.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.; CV-02-01486-PJH

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; CV-05-03026-PJH

MOSEL-VITELIC, INC.; MOSEL-

VITELIC CORPORATION (USA);

 ORDER

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES, AG; AMENDING

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH OPINION AND

AMERICA CORP.; HYNIX AMENDED

SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC.; OPINION

HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;

ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.; ELPIDA

MEMORY, (USA) INC.; NEC

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; NANYA

TECHNOLOGY CORP.; NANYA

TECHNOLOGY CORP. USA; WINBOND

ELECTRONICS CORP.; WINBOND

ELECTRONICS CORP. AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

14341 14342 IN RE DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.