Centerprise International v. Micron Technology, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 200806-15636California5,361 words
Opinion
Opinion
FISHER, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS
MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION.
CENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL, LTD,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.; MICRON
SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS INC.; No. 06-15636 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; D.C. Nos.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.; CV-02-01486-PJH
SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; CV-05-03026-PJH
MOSEL-VITELIC, INC.; MOSEL-
VITELIC CORPORATION (USA);
ORDER
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES, AG; AMENDING
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH OPINION AND
AMERICA CORP.; HYNIX AMENDED
SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC.; OPINION
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.;
ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.; ELPIDA
MEMORY, (USA) INC.; NEC
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; NANYA
TECHNOLOGY CORP.; NANYA
TECHNOLOGY CORP. USA; WINBOND
ELECTRONICS CORP.; WINBOND
ELECTRONICS CORP. AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding