Laizure

Laizure v. Bussetto Foods, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 200806-16857California2,940 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In the Matter of: CHARLES LAIZURE; 

JULIE ANN LAIZURE,

Debtors, No. 06-16857

BUSSETO FOODS, INC.,  BAP No. EC-06-1112-BMoS Appellant,

OPINION

v.

CHARLES LAIZURE,

Appellee.  Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Brandt, Montali, and Smith, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 16, 2008—San Francisco, California

Filed November 17, 2008

Before: Procter Hug, Jr. and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Richard Mills,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Hug

*The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

15405

IN THE MATTER OF LAIZURE 15407

COUNSEL

Michael Wilhelm, McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP, Fresno, California, for the appellant. 15408 IN THE MATTER OF LAIZURE Kristine M. Kelly, Fresno, California, for the appellee.

OPINION

HUG, Circuit Judge:

In this bankruptcy case, we determine whether a creditor that is required to return to the trustee a payment from the debtor made within the ninety-day preference period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.