Nevils

United States v. Nevils

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 200806-50485California6,703 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On April 14, 2003, LAPD officers specializing in anti-gang enforcement were investigating unrelated criminal activity at an apartment complex in a high-crime area of Los Angeles when they encountered Earl Nevils asleep on a couch in one of the apartments (Apartment 6). The officers were originally following another man because he ran away when they approached him and his friends on the street. As they fol- lowed the man into the courtyard of the apartment complex, he approached Apartment 6, started to enter, and then appar- ently changed his mind and entered another apartment on the other side of the courtyard. When the officers approached Apartment 6 to investigate, their attention was diverted from the other man to Nevils.

The wooden door of Apartment 6 was off its hinges and leaning against the interior wall, and the metal security door, or screen door, was ajar. Inside, the officers could see Nevils asleep on a couch. Leaning against Nevils’s body were two firearms—one on his lap and another leaning against his leg. There was a coffee table approximately one foot from the couch. On the table were several items that the police later determined to be baggies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.