Kalilu

Kalilu v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 200806-75425California1,950 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABRAHAM F. KALILU,  No. 06-75425 Petitioner, Agency No. v.  A98-132-223 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney ORDER AND General, AMENDED Respondent.  OPINION

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 3, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed February 14, 2008 Amended November 20, 2008

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Stephen Reinhardt, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

15683 KALILU v. MUKASEY 15685

COUNSEL

Socheat Chea, Esq., Duluth, Georgia, for the petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Esq., Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Holly Smith, Esq., Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Depart- ment of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

ORDER

The majority opinion filed February 14, 2008, slip op. 1369, and appearing at 516 F.3d 777 (9th Cir. 2008), is hereby amended as follows:

1. slip op. at 1374, line 3: Replace “and” with “or.”

2. slip op. at 1374, lines 3-5: Replace “If an alien is removed, he is no longer eligible for adjustment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.