Renteria-Morales

Renteria-Morales v. Mukasey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 200804-74742California8,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

IKUTA, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRMA RENTERIA-MORALES, 

Petitioner, No. 04-74742 v.  Agency No.

A92-202-968

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. 

MARIA JESUS RIVERA DE ALVARADO,  No. 06-73283 Petitioner, Agency No. v.  A17-970-844 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney

ORDER AND

General,

OPINION

Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 9, 2007—San Francisco, California

Filed December 12, 2008

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Richard C. Tallman, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Tallman

16311 RENTERIA-MORALES v. MUKASEY 16315

COUNSEL

Irma Renteria-Morales v. Mukasey, 04-74742

Martin R. Guajardo (brief) and Marty Robles (argued), Law Office of Martin R. Guajardo, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner.

Marshall Tamor Golding (brief) and Ann Carroll Varnon (argued), United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Maria Jesus Rivera de Alvarado v. Mukasey, 06-73283 16316 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.