Fones4all Corp. v. FCC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 200806-75388California5,426 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FONES4ALL CORPORATION, 

Petitioner, VERIZON; AT&T, No. 06-75388 Intervenors, v.  FCC No.

WC05-261

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS OPINION

COMMISSION; UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA,

Respondents.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission

Argued and Submitted September 12, 2008—Pasadena, California

Filed December 16, 2008

Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges, and Brian E. Sandoval,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Schroeder

*The Honorable Brian E. Sandoval, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

16483 16486 FONES4ALL CORP. v. FCC

COUNSEL

Michael B. Hazzard, Washington, DC, for petitioner Fones4All Corporation.

Scott H. Angstreich, Washington, DC, for the intervenors.

James M. Carr, Washington, DC, for respondents Federal Communications Commission, et al. FONES4ALL CORP. v. FCC 16487

OPINION

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

This is a petition for review of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.