Carideo

Carideo v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 200807-74458California236 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: KRISTIN CARIDEO; CATHERINE 

CANDLER,

KRISTIN CARIDEO; CATHERINE

CANDLER, No. 07-74458 Petitioners, v.  D.C. No.

CV-06-01772-JLR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT ORDER

COURT FOR THE WESTERN

DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

DELL, INC.,

Real Party in Interest.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2008* Seattle, Washington

Filed December 16, 2008

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard C. Tallman, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

16433 16434 IN RE CARIDEO

COUNSEL

Beth E. Terrell, Terrell Marshall & Daudt PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for petitioners Kristin Carideo and Catherine Candler.

Paul Schlaud, Reeves & Brightwell LLP, Austin, Texas, for real party in interest Dell Inc.

ORDER

The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED without prejudice. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.