Kleffman

Kleffman v. Vonage Holdings

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 200807-56171California1,108 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRAIG E. KLEFFMAN, individually  and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. 07-56171 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-07-02406-GAF VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP, a New  Central District of Jersey corporation, VONAGE California, AMERICA, INC., a wholly owned Los Angeles subsidiary; VONAGE MARKETING, INC., a wholly owned subsidiary, Defendants-Appellees. 

CRAIG E. KLEFFMAN, individually  No. 07-56292 and on behalf of all others D.C. No. similarly situated, CV-07-02406-GAF Plaintiff-Appellee, Central District of v. California, VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP, a New  Los Angeles Jersey corporation, VONAGE ORDER AMERICA, INC., a wholly owned CERTIFYING subsidiary; VONAGE MARKETING, QUESTION TO INC., a wholly owned subsidiary, THE CALIFORNIA Defendants-Appellants.  SUPREME COURT

Filed December 19, 2008

16585…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.