In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 200907-89142California456 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
FOR PUBLICATION JAN 05 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
JUDICIAL COUNCIL U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IN RE COMPLAINT OF Nos. 07-89142, 07-89144, 08-89012, 08-89030, 08-90029,
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT 08-90030, 08-90031, 08-90032,
and 08-90033
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Five misconduct complaints have been filed against a circuit judge, four
district judges and four magistrate judges. Complainant, a pro se prisoner, filed
several civil rights actions and habeas petitions in district court. The subject
judges were assigned to those matters.
Complainant alleges that the judges made improper substantive and
procedural rulings. These claims relate directly to the merits of the judges’ rulings
and must therefore be dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(ii); Misconduct
Rule 4(c)(1); Judicial-Conduct Rule 11(c)(1)(B). A misconduct complaint is not a
proper vehicle for challenging the merits of a judge’s rulings. See In re Charge of
Judicial Misconduct, 685 F.2d 1226, 1227 (9th Cir. Jud. Council 1982).