United States v. Orlando

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 200907-50473California2,198 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-50473 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-06-00308-AHM-

CARL ORLANDO, 001

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2008* Pasadena, California

Filed January 23, 2009

Before: Jerome Farris and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,** District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Farris

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

861 864 UNITED STATES v. ORLANDO

COUNSEL

Sean K. Kennedy, Federal Public Defender; Jonathan D. Libby, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cali- fornia, for the appellant.

Thomas P. O’Brien, United States Attorney; Sandra R. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.