United States v. Steve Key

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 201110-50325California247 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 21 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50325

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:99-cr-01095-SVW

v.

MEMORANDUM *

STEVE ERIC KEY, a.k.a. Seal A,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011 **

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Steve Eric Key appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Key’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds

for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his pro se supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.