Transpac Construction Co., Inc., a California Corporation v. Clark & Groff, Engineers, Inc.

Good Law
466 F.2d 823·1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7987
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 197225485, 26306California3,851 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hamley, J.

Transpae Construction Co., Inc. (Transpae) brought this Oregon diversity action against Umpqua Basin Water Association, Inc. (Umpqua), Clark & Groff, Engineers, Inc. (Clark & Groff), and Arthur V. Faulkner, to recover damages in the sum of eight hundred and fifteen thousand dollars for negligent and intentional interference with the performance of a contract. The contract is one under which Transpae undertook to install, for Umpqua, a pipeline for a domestic water supply system in Rose-burg, Oregon. Clark & Groff engineered the water supply system and supervised its installation. Faulkner served as Umpqua’s resident engineer on the project.

A trial was had before United States District Judge Gus J. Solomon on limited issues, including the issue of whether Umpqua and Transpae compromised and settled Transpac’s claim against Ump-qua. As aresult of this trial, and on October 22, 1969, Judge Solomon entered findings of fact (amended November 17, 1969), conclusions of law, and a judgment dismissing the action as to Umpqua. Transpae took a timely appeal from this judgment.

On March 13, 1970, the parties entered into a stipulation under which the action was dismissed as to Faulkner.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.