In Re Hugoton-Anadarko Area Rate Case

Good Law
466 F.2d 974·44 Oil & Gas Rep. 95·1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 8158
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 197271-1036California9,947 words

Opinion

Opinion

466 F.2d 974 97 P.U.R.3d 147 In re HUGOTON-ANADARKO AREA RATE CASE. The PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 71-1036. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 31, 1972. Lawrence Q. Garcia (argued), Mary Moran Pajalich, Rufus G. Thayer, Attys., Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners. Charles F. Wheatley, Jr. (argued), William T. Miller, Grace Powers Monaco, Washington, D. C., Mark L. Goldstein (argued), Bernard Rane, Mathias M. Mattern, Asst. Corp. Counsel for Public Utilities, Richard L. Curry, Corp. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., Max P. Zall, City Atty., Denver, Colo., for intervenors American Public Gas Assn., City of Chicago, Ill., and City and County of Denver, Colo. Leo R. Forquer, Sol. (argued), William P. Diener, Asst. Sol., J. Richard Tiano, First Asst. Sol., Gordon Gooch, Gen. Counsel, Federal Power Comm., Washington, D. C., for respondent. Carroll L. Gilliam (argued), of Grove, Jaskiewicz & Gilliam, Washington, D. C., George J. Meiburger (argued), of Gallagher, Connor & Boland, Washington, D. C., Thomas G. Johnson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.