22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T41e,A meat processor sought injunctive and declaratory relief in the district court against enforcement of a United States Department of Agriculture regulation which proscribes the addition of sorbic acid to processed meat products. From a summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Agriculture, the processor appeals. The district court decision is reported, in Chip Steak Co. v. Hardin, 332 F.Supp. 1084 (N.D.Cal.1971). The district court’s careful and comprehensive memorandum opinion fully states the law and the facts. The challenged U.S.D.A. regulation, found at 9 C.F.R. § 318.7 (d)(2), was adopted pursuant to the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1907, 34 Stat. 1260 , as amended by the Wholesome Meat Act of 1967, Pub.L. 90-201, 81 Stat. 584, 21 U.S.C. § 601 , et seq. (Supp.1971). The regulation provides: Chip Steak attacks the regulation on a variety of procedural grounds. We agree with the district court that the asserted deficiencies in the department’s rule-making procedure afford no basis for attacking the regulation. Affirmed.24:T439,

A meat processor sought injunctive and declaratory relief in the district court against enforcement of a United States Department of Agriculture regulation which proscribes the addition of sorbic acid to processed meat products. From a summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Agriculture, the processor appeals.

The district court decision is reported, in Chip Steak Co. v. Hardin, 332 F.Supp. 1084 (N.D.Cal.1971). The district court’s careful and comprehensive memorandum opinion fully states the law and the facts.

The challenged U.S.D.A. regulation, found at 9 C.F.R. § 318.7 (d)(2), was adopted pursuant to the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1907, 34 Stat. 1260 , as amended by the Wholesome Meat Act of 1967, Pub.L. 90-201, 81 Stat. 584, 21 U.S.C. § 601 , et seq. (Supp.1971). The regulation provides:

Chip Steak attacks the regulation on a variety of procedural grounds. We agree with the district court that the asserted deficiencies in the department’s rule-making procedure afford no basis for attacking the regulation.

Affirmed.