United States v. Robert Stephen Basey

Good Law
468 F.2d 194·1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7365
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 197272-1813California518 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

Appellant Basey was indicted with three co-defendants of the possession, with intent to distribute, various amounts of dl-desoxyephedrine, a “Schedule III controlled substance.” This was a four count indictment with three substantive counts (involving .9 gram, 456 grams, and 802 grams, respectively)—[ 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1)]—and a conspiracy count — [ 21 U.S.C. § 846 ], Appellant Basey was convicted only on Count One, involving a “sample” of the drug in his possession.

Government agents supplied appellant and his co-defendants at differing-times with a difficult to get chemical essential to the manufacture of dl-desoxyephedrine, namely: “phenyl-2-propanone” (commonly known, and hereinafter referred to, as “P2P”). No defendant testified. The government’s testimony as to the “trade” of the P2P for certain quantities of the controlled substance resulted in a jury verdict for all defendants on Counts Two, Three and Four on grounds of government entrapment. The jury, after some deliberation, asked the judge whether the government-had supplied the essential chemical (P2P) for the production of the .9 gram which was the subject of Count One. The trial judge stated there was no direct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.