United States v. Rosendo Rodriguez-Zetina

Good Law
469 F. App'x 630
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 29, 201211-10081California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 29 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10081

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01329-GMS-

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ROSENDO RODRIGUEZ-ZETINA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Rosendo Rodriguez-Zetina appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 41-

month sentence for being found in the United States after removal, in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

Rodriguez-Zetina’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). along with a motion to withdraw as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.