Iwan Susanto v. Holder

Good Law
472 F. App'x 572
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 201208-74907California316 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Iwan Susanto, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and we remand.

Susanto does not challenge the agency’s dispositive determination that his asylum application was time-barred. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not supported by argument are deemed waived). Accordingly, his asylum claim fails.

Similarly, Susanto has not raised any argument challenging the agency’s denial of his CAT claim. See id. Accordingly, his CAT claim also fails.

With respect to withholding of removal, substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Susanto’s experiences in Indonesia did not rise to the level of persecution. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003). In addition, the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.