Crystal Lightfoot v. Cendant Mortgage Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 201210-56068California382 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 13 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

CRYSTAL MONIQUE LIGHTFOOT; No. 10-56068

BEVERLY ANN HOLLIS-ARRINGTON,

D.C. No. 2:02-cv-06568-CBM- Plaintiffs - Appellants, AJW Central District of California, v. Los Angeles

CENDANT MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, doing business as PHH ORDER Mortgage; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

We hereby sua sponte withdraw the memorandum disposition filed on

January 9, 2012.

Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc

are denied as moot.

Upon review of the record and the briefing, this court has determined that

the appointment of pro bono counsel in this appeal would benefit the court’s

review. The court by this order expresses no opinion as to the merits of this

appeal. The Clerk shall enter an order appointing pro bono counsel to represent

appellants for purposes of this appeal only. Pro bono counsel shall consult with appellants to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.