Vora

Vora v. Holder

Good Law
477 F. App'x 435
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 201208-70193California576 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yasin Yusuf Vora and his family, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo the agency’s legal determinations and review for substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We grant the petition for review, and we remand.

With respect to asylum, we reject Vora’s unexhausted contention that the IJ applied a heightened “exceptional circumstances” standard instead of the proper “extraordinary circumstances” standard when assessing Vora’s explanation for his untimely asylum application. See Tall v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir.2008). However, the record compels the conclusion that the 2002 religious riots in Gujarat, the destruction of Vora’s family’s home and business, and his brother’s disappearance constitute changed circumstances that may excuse the untimely filing of his asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.