Atto Gampu v. Eric Holder, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 201209-71779California299 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 23 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ATTO GAMPU; CHARLOTTE IRENE No. 09-71779
TUUK,
Agency Nos. A095-310-917 Petitioners, A095-310-918
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 17, 2012 **
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Atto Gampu and Charlotte Irene Tuuk, natives and citizens of Indonesia,
petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying
their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to
reopen. Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.…