Roberto Escobar-Mejia v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
472 F. App'x 760
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 201209-73027California300 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Roberto Escobar-Mejia, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.

Escobar-Mejia testified that he was shot at one time and verbally threatened while working as a bus driver in Guatemala. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Escobar-Mejia failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of an actual or imputed political opinion or any other protected ground. See Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 865-66 (9th Cir.2001) (no nexus between rape by guerillas and a protected ground). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s finding that EscobarMejia failed to establish that the government is unwilling or unable to protect him. See Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.