Mark Supanich v. Kevin Rundle

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 201210-36186California502 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 17 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARK SUPANICH, a single man No. 10-36186 individually and as guardian for S.S., a minor child, D.C. No. 3:10-cv-05008-RBL

Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM *

v.

KEVIN RUNDLE,

Defendant,

and

SANDY PEDIGO, a single woman; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 26, 2012 **

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mark Supanich appeals pro se from the district court’s orders dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants conspired to violate his

constitutional rights in state child custody proceedings. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.