Foster

Foster v. Runnels

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 5, 200906-15719California4,184 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cowen, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD P. FOSTER,  No. 06-15719 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-03-01113-DFL

D.L. RUNNELS,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 12, 2008* San Francisco, California

Filed February 5, 2009

Before: Robert E. Cowen,** Sidney R. Thomas and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Cowen

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable Robert E. Cowen, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.

1321 1324 FOSTER v. RUNNELS

COUNSEL

Megan R. O’Carroll, Esq., and Constance L. Picciano, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, Cali- fornia, for the appellee.

Ronald P. Foster, SVSP, Salinas Valley State Prison, Soledad, California, for the appellant, pro se.

OPINION

COWEN, Circuit Judge:

Ronald Foster, pro se, appeals the order of the District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.