Sun

Sun v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 9, 200906-74450California2,029 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENQIN SUN, 

Petitioner, No. 06-74450 v.  Agency No. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney A079-592-229 General, Respondent. 

WENQIN SUN, 

Petitioner, No. 07-70691 v.  Agency No.

A079-592-229

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 21, 2008—San Francisco, California

Filed February 9, 2009

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson, and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Schroeder COUNSEL

Drew Sieminski, Oakland, California, for the petitioner.

Jem C. Sponzo, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Wenqin Sun is a native and citizen of China, and she is also a battered spouse. The Board of Immigration 1452 SUN v. MUKASEY Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.